http://www.clickqualityconsultant.com/index.php/2008/06/11/case-study-sometimes-it-aint-click-fraud/ Articles and Comments on 'Clicks'. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:53:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 http://www.clickqualityconsultant.com/index.php/2008/06/11/case-study-sometimes-it-aint-click-fraud/#comment-444 Russell Taylor Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:39:12 +0000 http://www.clickqualityconsultant.com/?p=310#comment-444 "These clicks were perfectly valid, and internal grudges is not an acceptable reason for a refund from Google." Fortunately in both US and UK Law Google is responsible for their employees action and because the Cost Per Click was amended without the customer's authorisation then they are responsible for the bill and not the customer. Google would legally not be able to recover this amount from their customer regardless of their stated Terms and Conditions. There are already several exaples of case law I know about which sets precedence for this, and these are well documented for anyone willing to search leagal records. “These clicks were perfectly valid, and internal grudges is not an acceptable reason for a refund from Google.” Fortunately in both US and UK Law Google is responsible for their employees action and because the Cost Per Click was amended without the customer’s authorisation then they are responsible for the bill and not the customer. Google would legally not be able to recover this amount from their customer regardless of their stated Terms and Conditions. There are already several exaples of case law I know about which sets precedence for this, and these are well documented for anyone willing to search leagal records.

]]>